* Allow setting the VS Code build target For the NPM package (and tests, at least for now), we will still use linux-x64, but this is going to allow using the platform build targets for our standalone releases so we can avoid having to copy all the packaging steps (like cleaning up modules). This does mean that the NPM package when installed will be missing those cleanup steps. Possibly we can try to break out the packaging step into a something that can be ran standalone (which will also require installing dev dependencies like gulp) but not sure how much work this would be. * Preserve dependencies for e2e tests To avoid having to install them again. Also moved an env block to the root of the job. * Refactor releases to use VS Code packaging Instead of building the linux-x64 package, stripping the modules, then installing them again, we build the correct target and use the modules as they are. This means we do not have to copy all the post-processing steps like the ones that delete unnecessary modules. For the NPM package we still publish the linux-x64 package (without modules of course). This means npm installations do not get that same post-processing. Another advantage of this is that we can run the release immediately without having to wait for the build step, or on a commit that no longer has a build artifact, since they all build individually now. We could try sharing the core-ci build step, but leaving that alone for now. I also converted the macOS jobs into a matrix. Deleted the CI readme because it was out of date and seemed to just repeat what should be described in the scripts anyway. Removed a section about Homebrew since we do not maintain that anymore. It looks like there is no need to symlink node_modules.asar anymore.
4.1 KiB
Maintaining
We keep code-server up to date with VS Code releases (there are usually two or three a month) but we are not generally actively developing code-server aside from fixing regressions.
Most of the work is keeping on top of issues and discussions.
Releasing
- Check that the changelog lists all the important changes.
- Make sure the changelog entry lists the current version of VS Code.
- Go to GitHub Actions > Draft release > Run workflow on the commit you want to release. For the version we match VS Code's minor and patch version. The patch number may become temporarily out of sync if we need to put out a patch, but if we make our own minor change then we will not release it until the next minor VS Code release.
- CI will build an NPM package and platform-specific packages, and upload those to a draft release.
- Update the resulting draft release with the changelog contents.
- Publish the draft release after validating it.
- Update the changelog with the release date and bump the Helm chart version once the Docker images have published.
- Merge the PR submitted to coder/code-server-aur repo.
Release Candidates
We prefer to do release candidates so the community can test things before a full-blown release. To do this follow the same steps as above but:
- Add a
-rc.<number>suffix to the version. - When you publish the release select "pre-release". CI will not automatically publish pre-releases.
- Do not update the chart version or merge in the changelog until the final release.
AUR
We publish to AUR as a package here. This process is manual and can be done by following the steps in this repo.
Docker
We publish code-server as a Docker image here, tagging it both with the version and latest.
This is currently automated with the release process.
nixpkgs
We publish code-server in nixpkgs but it must be updated manually.
npm
We publish code-server as a npm package here.
This is currently automated with the release process.
Testing
Our testing structure is laid out under our Contributing docs.
If you're ever looking to add more tests, here are a few ways to get started:
- run
npm run test:unitand look at the coverage chart. You'll see all the uncovered lines. This is a good place to start. - look at
test/scriptsto see which scripts are tested. We can always use more tests there. - look at
test/e2e. We can always use more end-to-end tests.
Otherwise, talk to a current maintainer and ask which part of the codebase is lacking most when it comes to tests.
Documentation
Troubleshooting
Our docs are hosted on Vercel. Vercel only shows logs in realtime, which means you need to have the logs open in one tab and reproduce your error in another tab. Since our logs are private to Coder the organization, you can only follow these steps if you're a Coder employee. Ask a maintainer for help if you need it.
Taking a real scenario, let's say you wanted to troubleshoot this docs change. Here is how you would do it:
- Go to https://vercel.com/codercom/codercom
- Click "View Function Logs"
- In a separate tab, open the preview link from github-actions-bot
- Now look at the function logs and see if there are errors in the logs