From 8d3cfe46ed96dff6d829c7f2b612d7e1e5aefd19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Sampson <adrian@radbox.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:52:43 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Ignore a new pep8-naming error

The new error <https://github.com/PyCQA/pep8-naming/pull/157> strikes me
as a little overzealous: while most exceptions are errors, there are
some Exception subclasses that are *not* properly considered errors
(e.g., when they're only a base class for other error classes).
---
 setup.cfg | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/setup.cfg b/setup.cfg
index 761ab1de3..7bcd41620 100644
--- a/setup.cfg
+++ b/setup.cfg
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ ignore =
     FI50,  # `__future__` import "division" present
     FI51,  # `__future__` import "absolute_import" present
     FI53,  # `__future__` import "print_function" present
+    N818,  # Exception subclasses should be named with an Error suffix
 per-file-ignores =
     ./beet:D
     ./docs/conf.py:D